Was thinking of someone like Cahill on a free transfer

Or a Josh King. But yeah we tried for the young, promising talents and were out bid financially probably because we wanted to bring in so many players. 3 permanent signings for higher transfer fees might have been more useful

Posted By: roedtonowhere on January 2nd 2022 at 22:48:48

Message Thread

The issue is not the ownership but how we spent this money (NCFC) - Joe Strimmer, Jan 2, 22:15:18
- It’s both (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 3, 09:43:47
- But its also possible it may pay off in the long run. (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 2, 23:04:02
- Because we can’t afford oven ready prem players salaries and fees (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jan 2, 22:16:12
  - Don't think it's that we can't afford them (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Jan 2, 22:23:21
    - I think we could of afforded both - we were unwilling to pay the extra few million (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Jan 2, 22:41:46
      - TBF thats what we have always done under Webber. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 2, 23:05:14
        
        Play the probabilities. Just need a few gems and some will inevitably fail (NCFC) - NorskyNormann, Jan 2, 23:40:55
    - Ajer and billing both players we wanted … (NCFC) - loz, Jan 2, 22:39:10
      - Brentford and Bournemouth could afford (NCFC) - matgore, Jan 3, 10:59:10
      - Was thinking of someone like Cahill on a free transfer (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Jan 2, 22:48:48

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.