The formation change doesn't have room for a playmaker though
If it's the god awful 433 we've been trying to play all season. Think we should've just bought an Emi type replacement. Another creative type. Instead we have Sargent wide right...
Posted By: roedtonowhere on December 27th 2021 at 17:53:38
Message Thread
- We moved from a play maker model to a winger model (NCFC) - Joe Strimmer, Dec 27, 17:46:17
- That wouldn’t have worked given Emi is the best we could dream of (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 27, 19:03:17
- The vision makes no sense when our striker is unsuited to the system (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Dec 27, 19:11:08
- Well, yes. Although smith is not a target man fan (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 27, 20:12:05
- The vision makes no sense when our striker is unsuited to the system (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Dec 27, 19:11:08
- The formation change doesn't have room for a playmaker though (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Dec 27, 17:53:38
- That's what I mean... We changed away from a play maker formation (NCFC) - Joe Strimmer, Dec 27, 17:55:23
- True, the style in the first Prem season was fine (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Dec 27, 17:58:10
- That's what I mean... We changed away from a play maker formation (NCFC) - Joe Strimmer, Dec 27, 17:55:23
- That wouldn’t have worked given Emi is the best we could dream of (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 27, 19:03:17
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.