Last night was completely set up for Pukki playing off the last defender over and over
Sargent wasn’t going to be threading balls to him in a month of Sundays and wasn’t even close enough to win headers down to him.
The hold up player only really works if there is an ‘out’ for the possession he wins or protects.
Cantwell would be the solution when he is fit as he is far more intelligent than Sargent will ever be.
Idah could do the same job as Sargent in the interim but we are really going to be struggling for open play goals in the absence of a more aggressive and confident striker to partner Pukki.
Hopefully January will see us still within recoverable distance of Brentford/Leeds at al.
Posted By: Munich93 on December 1st 2021 at 08:01:09
Message Thread
- Time to rest Sargent (NCFC) - Munich93, Dec 1, 07:34:25
- Why is he getting so much flak?… (NCFC) - loz, Dec 1, 07:41:20
- I don't rate him, but I agree, he wasn't much worse than most of the rest of the team (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Dec 1, 07:53:16
- Flak Quack (n/m) (NCFC) - Augustus Pablo, Dec 1, 07:51:08
- I’d be ok with dropping him if we had someone better to bring in (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 1, 07:44:05
- Onel Hernandez (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Dec 1, 08:01:12
- Not doing much at Boro in the division below (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Dec 1, 08:19:58
- Hardly played for a year ffs. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Dec 1, 09:36:26
- Not doing much at Boro in the division below (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Dec 1, 08:19:58
- Last night was completely set up for Pukki playing off the last defender over and over (NCFC) - Munich93, Dec 1, 08:01:09
- Utter guff (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 1, 08:11:41
- They were a man down with an unfamiliar match up (NCFC) - Munich93, Dec 1, 08:22:52
- Yes - there was no space in behind to thread a through ball (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 1, 09:24:25
- Yes they sat in and defended deep not sure what your point is (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Dec 1, 08:26:32
- My point is that decision making around marking Pukki becomes fudged (NCFC) - Munich93, Dec 1, 08:36:28
- Do you even believe what you type? (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 1, 09:25:52
- We only really had that when idah came on as … (NCFC) - loz, Dec 1, 08:38:45
- I think Idah could do with a spell on loan (NCFC) - Munich93, Dec 1, 08:50:24
- I think that’s right but not without us getting in a replacement (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 1, 09:47:36
- I think Idah could do with a spell on loan (NCFC) - Munich93, Dec 1, 08:50:24
- My point is that decision making around marking Pukki becomes fudged (NCFC) - Munich93, Dec 1, 08:36:28
- Quite. He'd be marking the fucking keeper. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 1, 08:16:09
- Problem was that Tzolis and Sargent weren’t offering (NCFC) - jamesward, Dec 1, 08:23:27
- Sargent seems happy to work but in non threatening areas (NCFC) - Munich93, Dec 1, 08:27:25
- In the interests of balance... (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 1, 09:46:37
- Again not sure why Sargent being singled out the whole … (NCFC) - loz, Dec 1, 08:30:37
- It was both "wide" players that tucked in and offered no option (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Dec 1, 09:39:56
- Sargent seems happy to work but in non threatening areas (NCFC) - Munich93, Dec 1, 08:27:25
- Problem was that Tzolis and Sargent weren’t offering (NCFC) - jamesward, Dec 1, 08:23:27
- They were a man down with an unfamiliar match up (NCFC) - Munich93, Dec 1, 08:22:52
- Utter guff (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 1, 08:11:41
- Onel Hernandez (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Dec 1, 08:01:12
- Why is he getting so much flak?… (NCFC) - loz, Dec 1, 07:40:39
- Why is he getting so much quack? (n/m) (NCFC) - Graham Nine, Dec 1, 08:48:00
- Why is he getting so much flak?… (NCFC) - loz, Dec 1, 07:41:20
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.