Be good if we’d made it permanent - Wrath of the Barclay

Be good if we’d made it permanent

Posted By: loz on November 21st 2021 at 15:49:48

Message Thread

Something strange from the canaries.co.uk first team page. (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 21, 15:47:58
- Kabak says in on loan (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Nov 21, 17:35:16
  - Disagree, I would think if we bought now.... (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 21, 18:34:02
    - Oh we should definitely buy him (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Nov 21, 20:09:21
- Trying to work out if it counts against our loans? (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 21, 16:00:05
  - Not a domestic loan so different rules (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Nov 21, 16:11:37
    - If we are in a good spot at Christmas.................. (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 21, 16:17:08
      - Assumes he’d want to sign on… (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Nov 21, 16:37:51
        
        Some players have a buy out clause..... (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 21, 18:37:13
        
        Some players have a buy out clause..... (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 21, 18:36:52
      - Only domestic loans are restricted to two (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Nov 21, 16:19:46
        
        Isnt there a total limit on loans in the squad? (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 21, 18:34:54
        
        Not foreign ones as they technically count as non-loan signings (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Nov 21, 19:49:28
- Option to buy it states. So depending on what we want not him. (n/m) (NCFC) - Thegelman, Nov 21, 15:54:30
- Be good if we’d made it permanent (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Nov 21, 15:49:48

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.