Regardless of Farke vintage

I'd have hoped for a better field of options than we're being linked with (noting that we may have a better field that we're not aware of).

Also, hard to judge managers if you're only looking at their recent record. So many variables.

Posted By: Cardiff Canary on November 11th 2021 at 18:03:57

Message Thread

Hoping that we're going under the radar again (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Nov 11, 17:47:55
- Which nine names ? You only mentioned a few? (n/m) (NCFC) - IG88, Nov 11, 18:22:49
  - Wroth reference? 9 (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Nov 11, 18:35:57
- Peak Farke, and I’d agree (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Nov 11, 17:55:24
  - Regardless of Farke vintage (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Nov 11, 18:03:57
- Was always likely to be the case hence many … (NCFC) - loz, Nov 11, 17:52:15
  - Not sure 'always likely to be the case' is true (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Nov 11, 17:58:27

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.