Well I mean he can't defend...

but neither apparently can either of our proper LBs so we might as well go with someone who is (theoretically) better going forward.
Wing backs is risky anyway against Leeds who based on my viewings of them love nothing better than a long diagonal ball into the areas behind where our wing backs will be. I'd have reverted to a back 4 for that reason but I guess we're fully committed to 3 CBs now.

Posted By: mr carra on October 31st 2021 at 13:06:51

Message Thread

Team news in... (NCFC) - DrDublin, Oct 31, 13:00:15
- Damn... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 31, 13:21:00
- I wish the team news wasn’t in looking at that Dubs. (n/m) (NCFC) - Biggles, Oct 31, 13:19:28
  - at this point, who knows, lets hope it works (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 31, 13:21:31
    - Fingers crossed (n/m) (NCFC) - Biggles, Oct 31, 13:49:07
- Doubt anybody guessed that (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Oct 31, 13:03:34
- I guessing its more 3421 (n/m) (NCFC) - cardiffgali, Oct 31, 13:03:33
- Good god (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Oct 31, 13:03:12
- Rashica as a wing back? (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 31, 13:01:44
  - Well I mean he can't defend... (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 31, 13:06:51
- Hmm (n/m) (NCFC) - stanleh, Oct 31, 13:01:27
  - Yer that’s what I thought (n/m) (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Oct 31, 13:03:18
    - same hear. For me a lot rest on Rashuca defensive abilities (n/m) (NCFC) - cardiffgali, Oct 31, 13:04:48

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.