Read a while back the were serious misgivings about whether they should give it to

16 year olds at all as the evidence has to weight the risk against the benefits and at the time there were slim benefits other than reducing spread but this conincided with rare examples of heart inflammation on second dose. Hence 1 dose to reduce community spread but not second as it could be harmful. Not an expert and like many trying to fathom what the experts are really saying

Posted By: Basingstoke_Canary on October 29th 2021 at 21:20:23

Message Thread

FFS - When did they decide 16/17 year olds not getting 2nd vaccine? (General Chat) - Azteca, Oct 29, 20:59:41
- not sure a 2nd vaccine was ever committed to (General Chat) - Henclrikus, Oct 29, 21:06:37
  - Just assumed they would......because cant think why they wouldn't tbh (n/m) (General Chat) - Azteca, Oct 29, 21:09:33
- They haven’t decided to give them 2nd jabs yet (General Chat) - jampersands, Oct 29, 21:04:03
  - Do you know the reason they havent decided to give them after 3 months (General Chat) - Azteca, Oct 29, 21:05:51
    - Just benefit / risk trade off (General Chat) - jampersands, Oct 29, 21:32:27
      - See here for example (General Chat) - jampersands, Oct 29, 21:34:31
        
        Thanks 👍 (n/m) (General Chat) - Azteca, Oct 29, 21:56:44
    - Read a while back the were serious misgivings about whether they should give it to (General Chat) - Basingstoke_Canary, Oct 29, 21:20:23
      - Thanks, at least that's an explanation. (General Chat) - Azteca, Oct 29, 21:57:44

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.