Because it was a sh*t team

I didn’t expect any changes to be honest but I don’t think it was the right team for the Brighton game either.

I don’t think that just because we scraped two distinctly uninspiring nil nil draws we’d struck a winning formula. I can understand the switch in formation but I think you still need to give the opposition some attacking threat to worry about as evidence at Chelsea where they were just able to attack at will with no worry about defending.

Posted By: Jim on October 28th 2021 at 17:13:01

Message Thread

Question: How many people, given the two draws, expected the team against Chelsea to be (NCFC) - Pixelman, Oct 28, 10:34:49
- We created decent chances against Brighton. I'd be happy with that team again. (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 28, 13:55:32
- ^ (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Oct 28, 10:49:01
- Why change a team unbeaten vs Brighton and Burnley (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 10:37:31
  - Because it was a sh*t team (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 28, 17:13:01
- Expected the same team, but thought Tzolis or Rashica might come in (NCFC) - jamesward, Oct 28, 10:36:26
  - How Sargent stayed in the team after Brighton is baffling (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Oct 28, 10:39:30
    - The thing is if you keep chopping and changing and only giving players (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Oct 28, 10:49:38
    - Well, that miss aside, he was one of our better players that game... (NCFC) - Pixelman, Oct 28, 10:42:21
      - Even with the miss aside, he was terrible (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Oct 28, 10:48:10
        
        that's not what I said. But I can see you are busting for an argument... (NCFC) - Pixelman, Oct 28, 10:49:25
        
        That's maddening. (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Oct 28, 10:56:57
        
        Agree. I wouldn't be playing him... well, not up front but feel (NCFC) - Pixelman, Oct 28, 11:02:32
        
        That's a fair point (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Oct 28, 11:11:30
      - Farke disagrees (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 10:46:03
        
        as I said... some will disagree... (NCFC) - Pixelman, Oct 28, 10:48:13
        
        About his striker potential… (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 10:49:41
        
        Ah... I guess time will tell. He may well turn out to be right but (NCFC) - Pixelman, Oct 28, 10:53:57
        
        He looked half decent on the right in cameos early on (NCFC) - jamesward, Oct 28, 11:02:48
        
        yep (n/m) (NCFC) - Pixelman, Oct 28, 11:04:31
  - Yep. Would have liked that. Can see why Josh was still in though. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pixelman, Oct 28, 10:39:19
    - Really? Why? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Oct 28, 10:40:08
  - same team i think its the subs which i often doubt with Farke (n/m) (NCFC) - pinkney, Oct 28, 10:38:13

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.