No. Webber was making a point that results can't be the only barometer of success.
His example was if we lose 1-0 to Leeds but we ourselves hit the bar 5 times. It wasvin response to Paddy's question on whether the board was giving Farke X number of games.
James appears to be making a separate point with the same analogy that if we'd only lost 1-0 to Chelsea it was actually our performance which was the problem.i agree with James.
I agree with Webbers specific point on this too for what it's worth.
But I can't imagine a world on current form in which what Webber described happens and that is the problem isn't it? It doesn't feel like we're close to turning a corner.
Posted By: trafford_canary on October 28th 2021 at 08:23:49
Message Thread
- To clarify, if we'd lost 1-0, played as badly as we did, and Chelsea (NCFC) - jamesward, Oct 28, 08:12:35
- Which is along the lines of what Webber said isn’t it ? (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Oct 28, 08:17:33
- Amazing you can type with your head that far up his arse (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Oct 28, 09:03:01
- Very constructive comment (n/m) (NCFC) - helvegtheowl, Oct 28, 10:02:56
- This is getting unhealthy now (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 08:28:36
- No. Webber was making a point that results can't be the only barometer of success. (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Oct 28, 08:23:49
- He said it would be seen as heroic failure (NCFC) - jamesward, Oct 28, 08:20:09
- Amazing you can type with your head that far up his arse (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Oct 28, 09:03:01
- Which is along the lines of what Webber said isn’t it ? (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Oct 28, 08:17:33
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.