That’s on Farke - Wrath of the Barclay

That’s on Farke

You can still criticise the tactics and agree with what’s written above

Posted By: SCC 28 on October 16th 2021 at 21:42:20

Message Thread

Thought the lads done ok today (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Oct 16, 20:25:02
- What were the good chances? (NCFC) - city_lad, Oct 16, 20:39:18
  - No clear cut chances except for the ones you are not counting (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Oct 16, 22:11:34
    - 😂 (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Oct 16, 22:14:09
  - We did have quite a few good chances but they did pretty much all come from (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 16, 21:29:50
  - Numbered in chronological order… (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Oct 16, 20:45:18
- You'd think this was widely accepted. (NCFC) - norwaay, Oct 16, 20:37:21
  - Who disagrees? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 20:46:36
    - All the posters blaming tactics - of which there are numerous. (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Oct 16, 21:37:46
      - That’s on Farke (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 21:42:20
        
        "created some good chances" (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Oct 16, 22:14:57
        
        Nearly everyone agrees surely (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:24:52
        
        Doesn’t mean we were as positive as we should have been (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:26:15
        
        We were positive enough to not deserve pelters for not being positive (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Oct 16, 23:05:00
    - Selwyn? (n/m) (NCFC) - Graham Nine, Oct 16, 20:57:43
- Yeah (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Oct 16, 20:33:41

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.