perhaps we're being too harsh on him then
we create so few clear opportunities though that there is massive pressure on the strikers to take even half chances.
Posted By: Mecagoenti on October 16th 2021 at 17:09:34
Message Thread
- Lack of quality up front cost us today. Should have won that. (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 16, 17:00:58
- The xG pretty level (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 17:04:27
- perhaps we're being too harsh on him then (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 16, 17:09:34
- or it may be just one stat nerds opinion........ (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 16, 17:23:51
- Interesting that a statto had it 0.12 though - we all thought it was over 0.9 I'm sure (n/m) (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Oct 16, 17:32:43
- 0.92 for me (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 17:37:55
- Interesting that a statto had it 0.12 though - we all thought it was over 0.9 I'm sure (n/m) (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Oct 16, 17:32:43
- or it may be just one stat nerds opinion........ (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 16, 17:23:51
- perhaps we're being too harsh on him then (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 16, 17:09:34
- The xG pretty level (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 17:04:27
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.