Some positives but that’s a sh*t result really. Should have won. Game was there for us.
If he wasn’t playing Sargent like most of us said should be the case we’d probably have won.
Positives - another point, matched a side who are playing well, clean sheet, looked a threat on the break at times, Normann was good again.
Negatives - good chance for a win missed, we continue to sacrifice our game/mojo for a style which is hard to watch at times, no goals again, Sargent can’t score, late subs again, if you are going to play this way your set pieces and balls into the box need to be good. We have zero threat still from set pieces and hit the first man far too often.
With Chelsea up next that’s going to be 2 points from 9 which is garbage. Not devastated at today but it’s another underwhelming afternoon.
Posted By: Jim on October 16th 2021 at 16:57:54
Message Thread
- Some positives but that’s a sh*t result really. Should have won. Game was there for us. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 16, 16:57:54
- Sargent has to play. (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Oct 16, 17:29:32
- Thought Sargent was great miss apart (n/m) (NCFC) - littletinyphil, Oct 16, 17:18:28
- We can’t play like this all season. To be more solid is brilliant, we only need to score (NCFC) - DH Yellow, Oct 16, 17:03:04
- Just another two weeks of the media taking the piss (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Oct 16, 17:02:34
- Misses aside Sargent was one of our best players tbf (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Oct 16, 17:02:12
- Like Burnley, it’s a decent enough point in isolation (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 16, 17:01:13
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.