If we're talking refereeing decisions yesterday - Wrath of the Barclay

If we're talking refereeing decisions yesterday

Can someone explain the difference between Ward Prowse v Chelsea, red card, & Wood on Kabak, yellow, except the latter was actually worse

Posted By: trt354 on October 3rd 2021 at 09:07:45

Message Thread

If we're talking refereeing decisions yesterday (NCFC) - trt354, Oct 3, 09:07:45
- I thought the ref was good yesterday but I also thought he was deliberately giving very (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 3, 10:21:18
  - I’m not so sure about that (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 3, 10:26:30
    - That’s my point. If ref has seen it and gives a yellow then hard for VAR to intervene (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 3, 10:29:18
      - I don’t think the speed with which he gives yellows makes any difference (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 3, 10:31:49
        
        Maybe. I was just struck by how quick it was. I’m not even sure if VAR can (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 3, 10:32:51
        
        Premier league guidance says VAR will not review “any yellow card” but (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 3, 10:37:00
        
        if you had read a bit more you would have seen this (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Oct 3, 10:40:46
        
        Fair enough (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 3, 10:43:02
        
        That means it won’t overturn a yellow (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 3, 10:38:47
        
        Yes it can, exactly what happened to ward prowse yesterday (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 3, 10:36:46
- There needs to a review system like in cricket, 2 reviews per manager etc.. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Oct 3, 09:29:38
- I’d say ward prowse was less in control. It was more of a lunge, wasn’t it? (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 3, 09:11:43

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.