I hope so, but in for whom?
I think we need McLean and PLM, so it would have to be Sargent. But if we’re dropping Sargent, I think I’d rather see Tzolis
Posted By: SimonOTBC on October 2nd 2021 at 17:27:52
Message Thread
- Well we will bank the point, the clean sheet and some resilience for once and (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 2, 17:01:50
- Agree, I think Cantwell in this side gives us the spark we need (n/m) (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Oct 2, 17:13:23
- I hope so, but in for whom? (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 2, 17:27:52
- Don’t think we need both of them. I agree Tzolis or Rashica for Sargent and Todd or (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 2, 19:27:13
- I hope so, but in for whom? (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 2, 17:27:52
- Fuck me, not giving credit to burnley for staying in the prem (NCFC) - littletinyphil, Oct 2, 17:08:44
- I thought the Burnley were shite comment was negative (NCFC) - littletinyphil, Oct 2, 17:20:42
- Oh yes I agree enjoy (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Oct 2, 17:23:43
- Don’t think Jim was negative he made some fair points (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Oct 2, 17:13:32
- I thought the Burnley were shite comment was negative (NCFC) - littletinyphil, Oct 2, 17:20:42
- Agree with that mate hope all's well (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Splat, Oct 2, 17:08:04
- Honestly tho (NCFC) - paulg, Oct 2, 17:03:26
- Did I say I expect us to? Just that Farke needs to tweak the balance in future gsmes (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 2, 17:07:43
- I thought our best spells in the match were when it was a bit stretched (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 2, 17:31:39
- Did I say I expect us to? Just that Farke needs to tweak the balance in future gsmes (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 2, 17:07:43
- Agree, I think Cantwell in this side gives us the spark we need (n/m) (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Oct 2, 17:13:23
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.