it was a textbook case of getting in the keepers' eye line and blocking his vision

presumably that's the whole point of him being stood there in the first place. Seems a bit of a stupid tactic though if the opposition don't have players on the posts.

Posted By: Mecagoenti on August 28th 2021 at 16:47:25

Message Thread

F**king ridiculous. Ball nowhere near him (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 28, 16:44:05
- It doesn't matter. He is clearly interfering with play by blocking the keeper's view (n/m) (NCFC) - bjg123, Aug 28, 16:44:32
  - Agreed. Not in doubt, unless you have your yellow glasses on (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Aug 28, 16:46:58
    - Keeper wasn’t getting that and Todd standing there made no difference (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 28, 16:49:13
      - It doesn't matter if he was going to get there or not. (n/m) (NCFC) - bjg123, Aug 28, 16:50:27
        
        Yes it does (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 28, 19:42:06
        
        Yep Todd was clearly NOT interfering with play. Ghoul should have stood. (n/m) (NCFC) - Biggles, Aug 28, 23:08:13
  - No he wasn’t (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 28, 16:45:41
    - Why do you think he was stood there? (n/m) (NCFC) - bjg123, Aug 28, 16:48:10
    - it was a textbook case of getting in the keepers' eye line and blocking his vision (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Aug 28, 16:47:25
      - He did not prevent Schmeical from playing the ball, the keeper was never getting that (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 28, 16:55:12
        
        that's not the law (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Aug 28, 16:58:09
        
        So as to prevent them from playing the ball or attempting to play it (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 28, 19:42:50

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.