My theory is that they figured Gilmour is such a good quarterback but needs compensating

With 2 next to him.

The problem so far, for me, is that 4-3-3 suits top tier athletes which we don't possess. Ergo, we've struggled to get up the pitch for outlets and get back for screening. It's asking too much.

Posted By: trafford_canary on August 24th 2021 at 18:39:20

Message Thread

Anyone know/have a theory on the change of formation from last season? (NCFC) - DH Yellow, Aug 24, 18:14:19
- My theory is that they figured Gilmour is such a good quarterback but needs compensating (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 24, 18:39:20
  - The ideal person to go on Gilmours right is, obviously, Skipp (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 24, 18:39:49
- Lost two best players (NCFC) - KevinBond, Aug 24, 18:27:00
- Hate playing Pukki and Cantwell in a front 3. Doesn't suit (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Aug 24, 18:22:21
  - Funnily enough I don't think it's a terrible idea to drop Cantwell back into the (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Aug 24, 18:42:23
- Compensating for Skipp (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Aug 24, 18:17:55
  - Okay. That theory makes sense. Surely the idea is protect the back 4 and ‘play’ higher up (NCFC) - DH Yellow, Aug 24, 18:24:32
    - I think that's the. It's the diamond without Hoolahan at the tip (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 24, 18:52:48

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.