Or just practicing the shape so that we can have options?
3-4-3, 5-3-2 second half, 4-2-3-1 as we used recently as our base.
I’d suggest a little of both. That we want 3-4-3 up our sleeves whether it’s first choice formation or just used situationally, and that having no established left back yesterday was a perfect time to work with three at the back. The fact that we used it tells you that farke will use it in the prem. we wouldn’t have wasted a practice match in a formation we are never going to play.
If we were going to religiously stick with 4-2-3-1 again he would have just played Sorensen at left back for this game.
Posted By: Legacy Fan on July 17th 2021 at 13:32:13
Message Thread
- Wonder if yesterday’s 3-4-3 (NCFC) - jamesward, Jul 17, 13:15:59
- Thought Rashica, Placheta and Rupp got some nice little triangles going early (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Jul 17, 21:28:53
- I think it's best not to read to much into the first fixture of ore season (n/m) (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Jul 17, 18:40:09
- Or just practicing the shape so that we can have options? (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Jul 17, 13:32:13
- I wonder if our base formation may be more of a 4-1-4-1 this year (NCFC) - jAC, Jul 17, 15:22:33
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.