Did we have a sell on? Wasn't it a tribunal decided fee?

I am probably wrong but I had assumed in those circumstances the tribunal wouldn't impose a sell on

Posted By: SimonOTBC on June 8th 2021 at 13:29:58

Message Thread

in "not heard it said elsewhere" transfer gossip (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jun 8, 12:26:53
- He had an average season with us (NCFC) - Surrey Yella, Jun 8, 13:04:45
  - Thought he was pretty good for us (n/m) (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Jun 8, 18:35:44
  - Thought he was solid enough, if unspectacular (NCFC) - jamesward, Jun 8, 13:21:20
  - i thought 'good' not 'average'. one big mistake near end of season (n/m) (NCFC) - pab, Jun 8, 13:20:55
  - Good with his feet though in a way that most keepers aren't (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jun 8, 13:15:06
  - For his first season of regular football he did well. (n/m) (NCFC) - Hit Squadie, Jun 8, 13:10:21
- I think he’d be a very good buy if the price was right (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jun 8, 12:49:47
- Lot of cash for a back up keeper (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 8, 12:38:20
  - Unless Krul gets injured (n/m) (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Jun 8, 18:37:07
  - possibly, but cheap if he stays long-term (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jun 8, 12:43:48
    - Not cheap when you originally sold him for a nominal fee in the first place (n/m) (NCFC) - inutero, Jun 8, 12:49:48
      - it is all a bit complicated (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jun 8, 13:15:53
        
        Did we have a sell on? Wasn't it a tribunal decided fee? (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jun 8, 13:29:58
        
        I think it is the other way around (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jun 8, 13:39:58
      - We didn’t - did we?! (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jun 8, 12:50:40
        
        well, his Dad was run out on a rail (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jun 8, 13:04:04
        
        Indeed (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jun 8, 13:04:46
- I think other positions need sorting first (n/m) (NCFC) - Farkeball, Jun 8, 12:36:37
  - Can sort more than one position simultaneously (n/m) (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Jun 8, 18:37:35
- His stock has fallen massively. (NCFC) - lurd, Jun 8, 12:28:18
  - Norwich City - home for previously-broken footballers (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jun 8, 12:38:27
    - Teemu Pukki (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 8, 12:49:32
      - arguably, yes. (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jun 8, 13:05:06
        
        No way was Pukki "broken" when he joined us, he just wanted more money than Brondby could (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 8, 13:13:42
        
        did you see the word "arguably"? (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jun 8, 13:21:57
        
        He still hasn't, really. (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jun 8, 13:27:43
        
        Not even arguably "broken" (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 8, 13:26:23
        
        well take it up with Tricky then. He dealt it. (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jun 8, 13:51:23
  - That's easily done for a keeper these days,look at Krul. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Jun 8, 12:37:29

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.