Not sure its that clear cut. you see these catches all the time where the fielder thinks

they have a finger under the ball.

My gripe with that decision is that it was given out on the field and I think you have to at least look at it a few times and from different angles before giving a decision, not just a quick glance at the first reply that is shown.

Why is there not a side on angle and the zoom thing they usually have?

Posted By: Jim on February 24th 2021 at 13:17:30

Message Thread

Broad! (n/m) (Other Sports) - DrDublin, Feb 24, 13:07:26
- I don’t like this from England, no doubt that he dropped it (Other Sports) - Malkybarneedledick, Feb 24, 13:15:27
  - Not sure its that clear cut. you see these catches all the time where the fielder thinks (Other Sports) - Jim, Feb 24, 13:17:30
  - Defo some fines going to be handed out after that I reckon. (n/m) (Other Sports) - DrDublin, Feb 24, 13:16:26
- Stokes knew (n/m) (Other Sports) - KevinBond, Feb 24, 13:10:40
- oh. (n/m) (Other Sports) - DrDublin, Feb 24, 13:07:55
  - Sorry that is way too quick from the third umpire again (Other Sports) - Jim, Feb 24, 13:09:29
    - It may or may not be the right decision in the end but if you are overturning (Other Sports) - Jim, Feb 24, 13:12:36
    - Didn't even use the old zoom as they usually do. Rushed decision. (n/m) (Other Sports) - DrDublin, Feb 24, 13:12:11

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.