true, but hard for the ref to give the foul when he clearly got the ball

Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage on December 5th 2020 at 18:50:49

Message Thread

Was the ref correct that neither of there pen chances were fouls (n/m) (NCFC) - Strangeland16, Dec 5, 18:04:16
- On the vacancies one think first contact outside box... but (NCFC) - Pixelman, Dec 5, 18:37:51
  - The problem with the Vrancic one for me.... (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 5, 18:41:45
    - Vrancic no, Hanley yes, and the foul on Pukki was in the box (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Dec 5, 18:56:38
    - true, but hard for the ref to give the foul when he clearly got the ball (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 5, 18:50:49
      - Yes - that’s why I think 50:50 (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 5, 19:01:32
- I don’t think we could have complained if either were given (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 5, 18:34:36
- Had a good view of the Hanley one, and thought it was a penalty for sure. Very clumsy. (n/m) (NCFC) - phelans tash, Dec 5, 18:09:55
  - Looks like we got away with one today then need a bit of luck with all the injuries (NCFC) - Strangeland16, Dec 5, 18:14:07
- Well... (NCFC) - Sellbydave, Dec 5, 18:06:22
  - Were Wednesday fans aggrieved Fletchers blatant handball was given ? (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Dec 5, 18:25:30
    - I don’t really understand your point (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 5, 19:21:44
  - Yeah I thought the Hanley one was a pen (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Dec 5, 18:15:51
    - That’s why it looked close (NCFC) - Sellbydave, Dec 5, 18:24:10
      - I mentioned this yesterday after glancing at the Wednesday Wrath (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 5, 19:07:49
- Or have we got lucky (n/m) (NCFC) - Strangeland16, Dec 5, 18:04:29

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.