No it wasn't . . .
hard to keep 4 strikers happy when we only play one up top.
If we had kept him, he would only have been warming the bench.
This way he gets regular game time and next season hits the ground running for us.
Posted By: canary_wharf on November 28th 2020 at 17:29:50
Message Thread
- That Mcallum loan looked ridiculously odd at the time even more so now (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Nov 28, 17:04:55
- Was a stupid decision (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Nov 28, 17:11:03
- It was utterly idiotic. Loaning Sinani questionable as well. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Nov 28, 17:09:25
- No it wasn't . . . (NCFC) - canary_wharf, Nov 28, 17:29:50
- Good for him. We, meanwhile, don't have any fit strikers. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Nov 28, 18:17:52
- No it wasn't . . . (NCFC) - canary_wharf, Nov 28, 17:29:50
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.