Dunno why he's being disingenuous

The government haven't been tracking numbers of false positives, no.

However - the testing were using is highly accurate (% in the high 90s)

If we were talking about false negatives it'd be more tricky.

He's trying to argue that because there are false positives (inevitably some, down to fragments of spent infections, or possibly contamination) that none of the data is accurate or useful.

That is bollocks.

Posted By: Cardiff Canary on November 9th 2020 at 11:58:35


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in