No, that one's on Hanley. Shame as he was otherwise good

Regardless whether you feel Gibson could have done better, Hanley CHOSE not to clear, asking Krul to come get it, when he could have put it in row Z easily.

I thought Grant played really well, other than that lapse.

Posted By: NJ_Canary on October 24th 2020 at 19:13:28

Message Thread

I'm glad it didn't matter too much but what an abomination of a goal to concede (NCFC) - jAC, Oct 24, 18:56:10
- No, that one's on Hanley. Shame as he was otherwise good (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Oct 24, 19:13:28
  - Zimbo would've been more in tune with Krul or wellied it (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Oct 25, 01:04:05
  - Yeah Hanley read it a couple of times really well a couple of times (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Oct 24, 19:26:08
- Hanley's got to be attacking that ball and clearing it. Row Z (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Oct 24, 18:57:48
  - Interesting early in second half he could have easily passed back to goal instead row z (NCFC) - pinkney, Oct 24, 19:58:47
  - This, I don't want Hanley trying to be a baller (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Oct 24, 19:02:21
    - Yes, we just need our centre backs to do the basics well (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Oct 24, 19:06:45
  - Very true. (NCFC) - jAC, Oct 24, 19:01:12
    - Gibson looks a little slow and out of touch no surprise really (n/m) (NCFC) - pinkney, Oct 24, 19:59:33
    - True, Gibson struggled in the air a fair bit today. Lucky not to concede a pen later (n/m) (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Oct 24, 19:04:56

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.