Doesn't need to sack him to get a point across...
I have a feeling they may have a frank exchange of views at some point in the next couple of weeks.
Posted By: NJ_Canary on October 3rd 2020 at 14:56:34
Message Thread
- Can't see Webber accepting this for long (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Oct 3, 14:51:51
- Webber wouldn’t sack Farke if we lost 10 in a row (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Oct 3, 15:11:20
- He brought the players in (n/m) (NCFC) - inutero, Oct 3, 14:56:50
- Hughill isn’t plan A. DF has no plan B. (n/m) (NCFC) - bobble, Oct 3, 14:55:43
- That's why I think Webber may have words. He's bought so we can have a plan B (n/m) (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Oct 3, 14:57:58
- He’s said Daniel can stay as long as he wants (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Oct 3, 14:54:21
- Doesn't need to sack him to get a point across... (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Oct 3, 14:56:34
- They speak after every game, I'm sure he'll (NCFC) - Azteca, Oct 3, 15:00:21
- Doesn't need to sack him to get a point across... (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Oct 3, 14:56:34
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.