VAR in that case was too slow. But the rule is clearly sensible

Why should a valid penalty not be given just because it occurred in the last minute rather than, say, in the 75th minute. The penalty offence was clearly committed before he blew his whistle to end the game so the whistle doesn't negate it.

Posted By: mr carra on September 26th 2020 at 14:42:25

Message Thread

So, how long after you've blown for full time can you give a penalty? (n/m) (Other Football) - Lentil Weaver, Sep 26, 14:27:42
- What was the reason for 90 seconds added after the official 5 minutes (Other Football) - Kar1, Sep 26, 15:05:13
  - Might not be 5 minutes exactly though (Other Football) - mr carra, Sep 26, 15:41:47
    - Yeah, the referee is the sole arbiter of time (Other Football) - Lentil Weaver, Sep 26, 15:48:59
  - I think this is beef about contradictions in the 'laws of the game' (Other Football) - Lentil Weaver, Sep 26, 15:33:58
- Game isn't finished until the VAR review is complete (obviously) (Other Football) - mr carra, Sep 26, 14:35:46
  - That's ridiculous (n/m) (Other Football) - Lentil Weaver, Sep 26, 14:38:24
    - VAR in that case was too slow. But the rule is clearly sensible (Other Football) - mr carra, Sep 26, 14:42:25
      - Why not just every decision reviewed after the game and get the teams back out (Other Football) - Lentil Weaver, Sep 26, 14:54:20
        
        The whole point of VAR is to correct wrong decisions (Other Football) - mr carra, Sep 26, 14:58:54

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.