That was before he had Sorensen, Skipp, Sitti and Tettey to pick from

I think McLean ended up being default because the alternatives for the role were not good enough at the busy part of it... Leitner, Trybull and Vrancic didn't physically adapt.

Posted By: trafford_canary on September 5th 2020 at 14:09:53

Message Thread

Just a thought... would McLean be good as a full-back? (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Sep 5, 13:03:57
- Nah he is Farke's favourite midfielder. Closest we have to a box to box alrounder (n/m) (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, Sep 5, 13:20:20
  - That was before he had Sorensen, Skipp, Sitti and Tettey to pick from (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Sep 5, 14:09:53
    - Very good point about the latter 3 unfortunately (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Sep 5, 17:30:48
  - he does cover a lot of ground and is always running, I don't get the stick towards him tbh (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Sep 5, 13:32:24
    - Absolutely agree with that... (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Sep 5, 14:12:39
    - Also has a decent shot on him and can win a header... the (NCFC) - Pixelman, Sep 5, 14:12:12
      - his shooting is pretty poor (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Sep 5, 14:47:45
    - People prefer Vranic who is a classy player but lacks other attributes (n/m) (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, Sep 5, 13:49:46
- Ahead of two specialist LBs and Byram? (n/m) (NCFC) - 51eve, Sep 5, 13:04:32
  - no more as a fill-in as cover? (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Sep 5, 13:05:48
    - what makes you think that (n/m) (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Sep 5, 13:10:11

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.