A sell-on fee from a club with a massive player turnover isn't pointless
In fact he'd be more likely to leave after a year or two of sitting on the bench behind Robertson
Posted By: Banham canary on August 19th 2020 at 19:29:08
Message Thread
- Palace in for Lewis apparently (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Aug 19, 12:57:47
- At least the sell on fee would be more meaningful (NCFC) - usacanary, Aug 19, 14:39:35
- A sell-on fee from a club with a massive player turnover isn't pointless (NCFC) - Banham canary, Aug 19, 19:29:08
- Imagine ending up at shitty Palace when you thought you were going to Liverpool (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Aug 19, 14:03:58
- Agreed, but far more likely get game time at Palace (NCFC) - Saucerer, Aug 19, 14:51:28
- and might get a big move later if he impresses, like Wan Bissaka has done (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Aug 20, 02:28:32
- Agreed, but far more likely get game time at Palace (NCFC) - Saucerer, Aug 19, 14:51:28
- They were in for him in Jan, weren't they? (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Aug 19, 13:51:55
- At least the sell on fee would be more meaningful (NCFC) - usacanary, Aug 19, 14:39:35
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.