then the bet would simply be "to reach the final" rather than winning it
the odds would be shorter as it's obviously more difficult to go one better and win it. Still wouldn't be an each way bet.
Posted By: mike_the_sphinx on March 26th 2006 at 09:55:25
Message Thread
- Andy Murry..... (Betting) - PK_Canary, Mar 26, 03:40:54
- He's more likely to win the US open than Wimbledon... (Betting) - McVeigh POTS, Mar 26, 09:00:56
- how do you mean "each way"? (Betting) - mike_the_sphinx, Mar 26, 09:30:32
- You'll be able to bet each way on him reaching the final (n/m) (Betting) - IncaWarrior, Mar 26, 09:48:19
- then the bet would simply be "to reach the final" rather than winning it (Betting) - mike_the_sphinx, Mar 26, 09:55:25
- of course it fucking would (Betting) - SCC 26, Mar 26, 15:04:46
- Sorry, I didnt word my reply very well. (Betting) - IncaWarrior, Mar 26, 10:02:34
- yes you did, people are just fucking stupid (n/m) (Betting) - SCC 26, Mar 26, 15:05:08
- then the bet would simply be "to reach the final" rather than winning it (Betting) - mike_the_sphinx, Mar 26, 09:55:25
- You'll be able to bet each way on him reaching the final (n/m) (Betting) - IncaWarrior, Mar 26, 09:48:19
- how do you mean "each way"? (Betting) - mike_the_sphinx, Mar 26, 09:30:32
- Murray is 20/1 for the mens singles....go here and look (Betting) - mike_the_sphinx, Mar 26, 08:36:18
- He's more likely to win the US open than Wimbledon... (Betting) - McVeigh POTS, Mar 26, 09:00:56
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.