No.

Worthy slagging when there is justification is fine.

Tenuous bollocks like this just to make an easily dismissed point is a waste of everyone's time.

Posted By: Arganth on March 22nd 2006 at 15:05:41

Message Thread

Interesting letter to F365 (NCFC) - Caged Canary, Mar 22, 14:14:42
- Yaeh, cos both our goals on Saturday came through Hucks... (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Mar 22, 14:16:24
  - Yeah maybe you're right (NCFC) - Caged Canary, Mar 22, 14:25:50
    - Absolutely 100%... (NCFC) - Arganth, Mar 22, 14:29:38
      - Or you just disagreed for the sake of it (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Mar 22, 14:59:43
        
        No. (NCFC) - Arganth, Mar 22, 15:05:41
        
        Its hardly worthy bashing, its just comparison (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Mar 22, 15:10:37
        
        So making any kind of reference to a letter which is blatant Bruce bashing... (NCFC) - Arganth, Mar 22, 15:16:11
        
        The bloke that wrote it was explaining the route of his side's problems (NCFC) - Caged Canary, Mar 22, 15:27:38
        
        If the cap fits (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Mar 22, 15:22:42
        
        So you're now admitting it WAS Worthybashing for the sake of it ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Mar 22, 15:27:38
        
        Its not Worthy bashing for the sake of it AS ITS TRUE (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Mar 22, 16:02:11
        
        Read it again (NCFC) - Caged Canary, Mar 22, 15:32:17
      - As a general rule (NCFC) - Caged Canary, Mar 22, 14:40:36

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.