nope, I thought that. I don't think there was intent, but it's clearly a dangerous tackle
could've easily broken his ankle there. Surely that has to be a red
Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage on February 2nd 2020 at 16:47:15
Message Thread
- Not much difference between Raheem's tackle there and what Godfrey's serving a ban for (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Feb 2, 16:45:05
- I think the difference is that one dived in the other didn’t (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 2, 17:26:27
- Sterling is in control. Godfrey was trying to block the pass (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Feb 2, 18:36:37
- Todd’s was never a pen to be fair (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 2, 22:25:50
- Sterling is in control. Godfrey was trying to block the pass (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Feb 2, 18:36:37
- Worse as it was higher up so more chance of breaking the leg (n/m) (NCFC) - Kar1, Feb 2, 17:16:50
- Yep. Except one involved us (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 2, 16:58:30
- I said at the time if that's a big club VAR wouldn't of sent Godfrey off (n/m) (NCFC) - stanleh, Feb 2, 16:57:47
- Agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Feb 2, 16:51:14
- nope, I thought that. I don't think there was intent, but it's clearly a dangerous tackle (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 2, 16:47:15
- I think the difference is that one dived in the other didn’t (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 2, 17:26:27
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.