Which would be sad

We've used the 'we need the money' card to justify it previously. They know the ethics and optics of it arent great.

A few extra £x00,000s is hardly going to make a material difference for the next couple of seasons.

Posted By: CWC on January 25th 2020 at 08:02:29

Message Thread

'Football too dependent on gambling'' (Other Football) - CWC, Jan 25, 07:49:17
- There is no policy mentioned, other than the suggestion from Labour (n/m) (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, Jan 25, 11:25:11
  - That's rather why I used "Potentially" (Other Football) - CWC, Jan 25, 11:50:32
- I think it would be great for well run clubs like Norwich... (Other Football) - usacanary, Jan 25, 08:42:23
- Unless gambling sponsorship is banned outright (Other Football) - Trent_Canary, Jan 25, 07:56:16
  - Funnily enough if they were banned then it is possible that other industries would step up (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, Jan 25, 11:26:50
  - Which would be sad (Other Football) - CWC, Jan 25, 08:02:29
    - Why does everyone seem to have a problem with the shirt sponsor... (Other Football) - Darren Eadie, Jan 25, 09:52:30
      - Because you pick the fights you can win? (Other Football) - CWC, Jan 25, 10:33:02
    - I would be overjoyed to drop the betting firms. I hope we do it. (n/m) (Other Football) - shoddy, Jan 25, 08:32:15

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.