I think Webber has said 2/3s reduction.

That won't take some of the young players back to what they were on before but we will also be rid of Naismith and Jarvis.

But of course if we really want to keep the good players we could offer them new higher contracts without the reduction. I imagine anyone with an option to go will ask for that. Last time by all accounts we agreed. Time will tell if it will be different this time.

Posted By: Kangol Canary on January 6th 2020 at 12:53:05

Message Thread

Why is it not the case that when we get relegated again that players don’t get their wages (NCFC) - Thegelman, Jan 6, 11:54:43
- I assume parachute payments keep their wages higher than before promotion (NCFC) - Ben, Jan 6, 13:42:56
  - Hardly slimy (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 6, 15:31:43
- They get massively cut which is another reason... (NCFC) - loz, Jan 6, 12:20:16
- They do get reduced (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 6, 12:09:20
  - I think Webber has said 2/3s reduction. (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Jan 6, 12:53:05
    - I'd imagine we will also have various bonus clauses in there too (NCFC) - CWC, Jan 6, 13:42:59
- That was meant to happen last time (NCFC) - inutero, Jan 6, 11:59:06
- All about the contracts I suppose. (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Jan 6, 11:57:56

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.