Why don't we just play Emi at 10?
He wins more tackles than either Kenny or Stiepi, would cover as much ground as Kenny and more than Stiepi, would be closer to Pukki, and would be in a better position to actually score some goals.
And he wouldn't have to run himself into the ground covering right back.
The only thing you'd miss is an aerial threat. Kenny does win some headers, but Stiepi barely wins any.
Slight concern defending set pieces, but a price worth paying given we're not great at that anyway.
Posted By: duke of york on January 2nd 2020 at 10:54:17
Message Thread
- Why don't we just play Emi at 10? (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 2, 10:54:17
- certainly I don't think he should be tackling back beyond halfway, we need him for 90mins (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 2, 16:02:42
- Harsh. He did some excellent defensive stuff yesterday. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Jan 2, 16:41:14
- I think Cantwell is a better fit for a 10 (NCFC) - Merryxmas, Jan 2, 11:40:21
- It's both of their best positions imo (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 2, 11:40:57
- Our formation isn't rigid is it? (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jan 2, 11:56:23
- Yeah, they do (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 2, 11:58:51
- Our formation isn't rigid is it? (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jan 2, 11:56:23
- It's both of their best positions imo (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 2, 11:40:57
- We need someone with aerial prowess (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 2, 11:13:26
- That's not Stiepi then (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 2, 11:15:43
- And most number 10s / playmakers aren't renowned for their aerial prowess (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 2, 11:45:43
- Phil Boyer was great at controlling the ball by bringing it down off his chest, I recall (NCFC) - watfordcanary, Jan 2, 15:02:57
- And most number 10s / playmakers aren't renowned for their aerial prowess (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 2, 11:45:43
- That's not Stiepi then (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 2, 11:15:43
- Because we generally kick off later than that. (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Jan 2, 11:04:43
- agreed, think this would be a great move (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 2, 11:01:55
- Think number 10 is an position we are a little short in (n/m) (NCFC) - maidstoneyellow, Jan 2, 11:00:49
- Maybe he would if he had another wideman he trusts? (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jan 2, 10:58:07
- Onel? (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 2, 10:58:37
- He’s looked great in patches ... (NCFC) - loz, Jan 2, 11:02:04
- Onel? (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 2, 10:58:37
- Thought Mclean was pretty ineffective yesterday. As the season goes on this (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 2, 10:57:27
- I was repeatedly saying (NCFC) - CauldRon, Jan 2, 11:20:36
- He was not great, good energy as always, but lacks Prem quality for a number 10 (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 2, 10:59:21
- certainly I don't think he should be tackling back beyond halfway, we need him for 90mins (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 2, 16:02:42
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.