Appears to be. Who knows but given how fast Wickham was running in then

You’d have to question the margin of error.
Again.

Posted By: Jim on January 1st 2020 at 20:01:19

Message Thread

Ball hasn’t actually left Zahas foot in that VAR frame photo (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 1, 19:59:19
- Yep. They stop the frame when it suits them (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 1, 20:00:52
  - Apparently it is supposed to be the point closest to when it leaves the foot (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Jan 1, 20:55:07
  - This is why it's not accurate to use in tight decisions (NCFC) - eddie, Jan 1, 20:03:19
- Is it touching his foot? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 1, 20:00:23
  - Appears to be. Who knows but given how fast Wickham was running in then (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 1, 20:01:19
    - impossible to tell either way so until the technology can make it 100%clear, why are they (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 1, 20:02:15
      - It will never be 100% (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 1, 20:03:06
        
        I'm not sure it does. I bet I could produce a frame that makes him look offside (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 1, 20:05:18
        
        Well the linesman gave it offside so again you are back to (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 1, 20:05:18
        
        Of course it wasn’t clear and obvious (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 1, 20:12:44
        
        Pukki was mostly onside, Wickham was mostly offside (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 1, 20:31:20
        
        Yeah in real time was convinced neither decision would change (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 1, 20:34:17
        
        Yeah, we will be VAR-free just as it becomes sensible (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 1, 20:39:08
        
        The VAR use that is (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 1, 20:35:06

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.