9. For reals

We might reasonably have expected, if fully fit and playing OK

3 from Toon
1 from Chelsea
1 from Burnley
1 from West Ham
3 from Villa

And I doubt we beat City without the injury crisis bringing Tettey in. We're losing these games for want of a proper defensive midfield right now.

Posted By: NJ_Canary on October 5th 2019 at 18:45:53

Message Thread

How many points would we have had with a *normal* amount of injuries? (NCFC) - NorthByNorthWalsham, Oct 5, 18:41:54
- 9. For reals (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Oct 5, 18:45:53
  - Sorry, meant Palarse, not West Ham (n/m) (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Oct 5, 18:47:29
- I'd say we're only 1/2pts behind where we might have expected to be at this stage (n/m) (NCFC) - NorthByNorthWalsham, Oct 5, 18:44:03
  - But further back from palace, Burnley and Villa (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 5, 18:49:42
  - Exactly. Of course, that's also why this one and Palace hurt so much (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Oct 5, 18:47:52
    - Plus we’ve handed them three extra points (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 5, 18:50:43

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.