No
It might have been better to give a different reason, more arguably "proper" (and more obviously entangled with politics, and the achievement of a legitimate political end).
Posted By: paulg on September 24th 2019 at 12:42:50
Message Thread
- So that technically means that the supreme court is ultimately in charge of this country (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 24, 11:54:34
- Oh dear (n/m) (General Chat) - Charles21, Sep 24, 12:35:44
- Give it a rest now you boring cunt (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 24, 12:14:32
- Just asking a question. So i can be educated properly via the wrath (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 24, 12:42:03
- A question has one of these (?) at the end of it (General Chat) - NorthByNorthWalsham, Sep 24, 12:52:56
- Alright grammar nazi. Check yourself (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 24, 13:26:24
- A question has one of these (?) at the end of it (General Chat) - NorthByNorthWalsham, Sep 24, 12:52:56
- Just asking a question. So i can be educated properly via the wrath (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 24, 12:42:03
- it means the government is not above the law (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Sep 24, 11:58:22
- Not quite - it means it needs to give a proper reason (General Chat) - paulg, Sep 24, 12:09:37
- Because the govt couldn't be seen lying to the court (n/m) (General Chat) - duke of york, Sep 24, 12:12:43
- indeed (General Chat) - paulg, Sep 24, 12:16:02
- It might have been better to say parliament isn’t sovereign? (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 24, 12:38:21
- Parliament is. The PM/Government isn't. Big distinction. (n/m) (General Chat) - Jim, Sep 24, 12:54:09
- Well obviously (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 24, 13:00:30
- The problem (General Chat) - paulg, Sep 24, 13:07:41
- Well obviously (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 24, 13:00:30
- No (General Chat) - paulg, Sep 24, 12:42:50
- Parliament is. The PM/Government isn't. Big distinction. (n/m) (General Chat) - Jim, Sep 24, 12:54:09
- It might have been better to say parliament isn’t sovereign? (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 24, 12:38:21
- indeed (General Chat) - paulg, Sep 24, 12:16:02
- Because the govt couldn't be seen lying to the court (n/m) (General Chat) - duke of york, Sep 24, 12:12:43
- I love a bare witness. (n/m) (General Chat) - APB, Sep 24, 12:04:33
- Whoops. Wrong plaice! (n/m) (General Chat) - APB, Sep 24, 12:04:57
- I’m gonna witness some bare this weekend (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Sep 24, 12:17:49
- Whoops. Wrong plaice! (n/m) (General Chat) - APB, Sep 24, 12:04:57
- Ok so we may now bare witness to the writing of our unwritten constitution? (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 24, 12:02:53
- Not quite - it means it needs to give a proper reason (General Chat) - paulg, Sep 24, 12:09:37
- No, it doesn’t. (n/m) (General Chat) - Beaver Las Vegas, Sep 24, 11:57:38
- Why? (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 24, 11:59:56
- The Supreme Court (and the courts generally) will not substiturte their own decision for (General Chat) - Jim, Sep 24, 12:09:36
- Ahh ok, then in reality what we actually need is a written consititution (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 24, 12:41:20
- Sorry if it "was" not "wasn't" (n/m) (General Chat) - Jim, Sep 24, 12:11:53
- The Supreme Court (and the courts generally) will not substiturte their own decision for (General Chat) - Jim, Sep 24, 12:09:36
- Why? (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 24, 11:59:56
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.