Soon to be "null and void" but nevertheless interesting.
Posted By: KetteringRyu on September 11th 2019 at 13:38:15
Message Thread
- Proroguing question (General Chat) - duke of york, Sep 11, 12:35:35
- I can;t find the full text but I believe what the court has said is that (General Chat) - Jim, Sep 11, 12:53:24
- They found it unlawful (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 12:59:52
- You really need to choose your battles (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Sep 11, 13:22:12
- It’s a fact it was found unlawful (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 13:25:38
- The findings i agree as they are in print. I dont agree that it is unlawful (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 11, 13:28:07
- It’s a fact it was found unlawful (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 13:25:38
- And the Lord Chief Justice of England & Wales found it lawful (General Chat) - Old Git, Sep 11, 13:04:54
- And now a higher court has found it unlawful (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 13:10:14
- This is the battle you probably might have chosen to avoid ;-) (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Sep 11, 13:22:49
- Not a battle, there is no disagreement (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 13:24:43
- This is the battle you probably might have chosen to avoid ;-) (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Sep 11, 13:22:49
- And now a higher court has found it unlawful (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 13:10:14
- Yes but DOY was asking why they found it unlawful (n/m) (General Chat) - Jim, Sep 11, 13:01:34
- You really need to choose your battles (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Sep 11, 13:22:12
- They found it unlawful (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 12:59:52
- See. This is why it is a terrible idea to make judicial judgements on political decisions (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 11, 12:40:52
- That doesn't answer the question (n/m) (General Chat) - duke of york, Sep 11, 12:42:08
- It does if you had read underneath (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 11, 12:45:20
- I've read up on it (General Chat) - duke of york, Sep 11, 12:46:22
- No, that is the same argument... (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 11, 13:20:03
- The decision to prorogue was unlawful (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 13:22:48
- He really should read the court findings (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 12:48:33
- The court has capitulated that because the advice was unlawful (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 11, 13:21:53
- No shit Sherlock! (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 13:23:25
- Sorry, just realised you are simply just stating what the court has said (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 11, 13:32:08
- Yep sound findings for me (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 13:34:15
- Soon to be "null and void" but nevertheless interesting. (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 11, 13:38:15
- Yep sound findings for me (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 13:34:15
- Sorry, just realised you are simply just stating what the court has said (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 11, 13:32:08
- No shit Sherlock! (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 13:23:25
- The court has capitulated that because the advice was unlawful (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 11, 13:21:53
- No, that is the same argument... (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 11, 13:20:03
- I've read up on it (General Chat) - duke of york, Sep 11, 12:46:22
- It does if you had read underneath (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 11, 12:45:20
- That doesn't answer the question (n/m) (General Chat) - duke of york, Sep 11, 12:42:08
- the former (n/m) (General Chat) - fal5taff, Sep 11, 12:40:40
- I can;t find the full text but I believe what the court has said is that (General Chat) - Jim, Sep 11, 12:53:24
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.