Would they have been overturned?
At least one of them wasn’t off.
Also, yes, I thought also they were meant to let play go on.
Posted By: APB on August 9th 2019 at 23:00:17
Message Thread
- Couple of things from watching a frequently freezing stream in a French bar (NCFC) - APB, Aug 9, 22:53:58
- Absolutely. (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Aug 9, 23:31:54
- To be fair, the pundits were very complimentary, not patronising, after the match. (n/m) (NCFC) - Augustus Pablo, Aug 9, 23:05:02
- Easy to be complimentary after we’ve lost. (NCFC) - APB, Aug 9, 23:10:24
- I thought they were genuine about the second half (n/m) (NCFC) - Augustus Pablo, Aug 9, 23:24:10
- Easy to be complimentary after we’ve lost. (NCFC) - APB, Aug 9, 23:10:24
- Suspect that trey are just (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Aug 9, 23:04:54
- Same goes for Delia (NCFC) - King, Aug 9, 22:59:11
- 3 offsides that would have been overturned by VAR if we'd scored (NCFC) - 702, Aug 9, 22:58:07
- Would they have been overturned? (NCFC) - APB, Aug 9, 23:00:17
- Yes, I thought they were all on (although it was tight) (n/m) (NCFC) - 702, Aug 9, 23:28:27
- Onel was miles on. (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Aug 9, 23:37:08
- they need to sort out the offside law, there's too much leeway for misinterpretation atm (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 9, 23:46:03
- Onel was miles on. (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Aug 9, 23:37:08
- Yes, I thought they were all on (although it was tight) (n/m) (NCFC) - 702, Aug 9, 23:28:27
- Would they have been overturned? (NCFC) - APB, Aug 9, 23:00:17
- agreed, this has made me even more eager to see people's opinions rammed (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 9, 22:56:21
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.