We've had a few "good results" away.
Crewe and Leicester that I've seen, plus the scum that I didn't.
The difference being, of course, that in the case of Crewe and Leicester at least, noone with a brain that saw the games would say that there was anything particularlt meritworthy about the games apart from the scoreline. Leicester was daylight robbery - if there was any justice we'd've comfortably lost. Crewe wasn't quite so bad, but was still a very very poor performance, particularly in the midfield.
Classing either of those games as indicative of the good things we can do away from home is, in my opinion, taking a seriously blinkered view of the past.
Posted By: Arizona Bay on March 10th 2006 at 10:00:09
Message Thread
- Errm, what, Nigel? (NCFC) - Dog, Mar 10, 09:54:54
- Palace and Reading were... (NCFC) - DemoniCanary, Mar 10, 10:09:55
- lol (NCFC) - Dog, Mar 10, 10:10:31
- you have to laugh about.. (NCFC) - DemoniCanary, Mar 10, 10:18:36
- lol (NCFC) - Dog, Mar 10, 10:10:31
- We've had a few "good results" away. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Mar 10, 10:00:09
- Precisely... (NCFC) - Dog, Mar 10, 10:04:35
- You speak very cwell and cleary for a dog (NCFC) - conker, Mar 10, 10:17:56
- good results (NCFC) - BeverlyHills0201, Mar 10, 10:04:26
- More painful than the lack of wins away from home... (NCFC) - Dog, Mar 10, 10:06:19
- Precisely... (NCFC) - Dog, Mar 10, 10:04:35
- I agree dog (n/m) (NCFC) - Duck, Mar 10, 09:56:12
- Palace and Reading were... (NCFC) - DemoniCanary, Mar 10, 10:09:55
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.