Delias statement is not rational

She has selectively used statisitcs and factsto "prove" herself right. eg West Ham not sacking Pardew - but what about liverpool sacking houllier? or newcastle sacking souness? The opposite may just as well be true, you can't just have a principle of continuity unless you are doing the right thing! Otherwise you just reinforce errors.
Then she looks at worthy's record. Lets put that in context - lets look at the money worthy has spent - he's mediocre versus other managers if that is put into the equation.
This is not rational. Holding through bad periods is correct, but only when the fundamentals are in place. at the minute, they are clearly not.

Posted By: fal5taff on March 8th 2006 at 19:15:50

Message Thread

Delias statement is not rational (NCFC) - fal5taff, Mar 8, 19:15:50
- Houlllier had heart trouble, Souness hadn't proved himself earlier (NCFC) - Bonjour, Mar 8, 19:19:46
  - oh yeah, Houllier leaving was all about heart trouble (NCFC) - fal5taff, Mar 8, 19:27:30
    - I wouldn't mind betting that it was mostly to do with his heart trouble (NCFC) - Bonjour, Mar 8, 19:30:52
      - how much do you want to bet, i'll lay it for you (NCFC) - fal5taff, Mar 8, 19:37:46
        
        His heart couldn't take the pressure. What ever you say about Worthy (NCFC) - Bonjour, Mar 8, 19:46:56
      - oh, then use your "footy knowledge" (NCFC) - fal5taff, Mar 8, 19:36:06
        
        I never said it was a bad move to sack souness.. (NCFC) - Bonjour, Mar 8, 19:41:42
      - In the face of Houlliers admission that he was sacked, thats a breathtakingly bad bet (n/m) (NCFC) - fal5taff, Mar 8, 19:34:01

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.