I do know, yes.

But, given they have the ability to retrospectively judge the maliciousness of a foul with video evidence, you could minimise the risk of that happening.

And you could argue that dangerous play doesn’t have to be intentional to be dangerous.

Posted By: APB on April 30th 2019 at 18:32:30

Message Thread

Bahahahamford (Other Football) - Bungle, Apr 30, 16:59:04
- Might end up doing Leeds a favour (Other Football) - ede, Apr 30, 18:16:45
- He should be made to wear a surgical mask on Sunday (n/m) (Other Football) - Augustus Pablo, Apr 30, 17:44:22
- I know I said this the other day but......... (Other Football) - usacanary, Apr 30, 17:02:56
  - They ought to be banned from the game for a couple of years (Other Football) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Apr 30, 17:31:43
    - K Diddy returns... (n/m) (Other Football) - APB, Apr 30, 17:42:03
  - Although bad tackles might actually hurt another player (Other Football) - Tricky Hawes, Apr 30, 17:11:56
    - Yes but the risk/reward is a problem. (Other Football) - usacanary, Apr 30, 17:18:00
      - I’ve always thought if a foul injures a player, the fouler should be banned as long as ... (Other Football) - APB, Apr 30, 17:44:58
        
        That would plainly be bonkers, as you know (Other Football) - Tricky Hawes, Apr 30, 17:51:19
        
        I do know, yes. (Other Football) - APB, Apr 30, 18:32:30
        
        But also a ‘non-dangerous’ tackle can injure a player (Other Football) - Tricky Hawes, Apr 30, 18:51:23

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.