He may be a might more vulnerable BUT
what people are missing here is that they are not going to give him to the end of the season to maintain "stability" and then replace him in the summer. They are saying:
He's got a good record
We need stability
We are not going to sack him for this reason
You have to trust us
If you don't and you boo it is counterproductive and we won't get anywhere!
You don't hark on about stability and then sack him in the summer - he is here for keeps!
Posted By: Jim on March 8th 2006 at 15:32:09
Message Thread
- The statement (NCFC) - Jambocanary, Mar 8, 15:29:12
- Well... (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Mar 8, 15:35:07
- He may be a might more vulnerable BUT (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 8, 15:32:09
- I agree. He will be here next season for sure (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Mar 8, 15:34:56
- Sadly (n/m) (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Mar 8, 15:38:33
- I agree. He will be here next season for sure (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Mar 8, 15:34:56
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.