I'm not sure about that

I Emi's was a red but Leistner's just before was worse in my opinion as he left something on Emi.

It was a reckless, late and unnecessary challenge. If it hadn't been red we would have dodged one. A bit like Stiepermann's a few months ago (v Forest?).

I haven't seen slo-mo of any contact but even if their guy was jumping out of the way and barely touched it is fair enough red.

I hope we don't appeal as it would presumably go up to 4 games.

Posted By: Kangol Canary on April 7th 2019 at 09:46:30

Message Thread

3 game ban for emi seems overly harsh... (NCFC) - loz, Apr 7, 09:29:20
- Yesterday Farke said he was hoping for no ban because it wasn't that bad (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 7, 09:57:55
  - I can only assume he said that before seeing a replay... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 7, 10:07:23
    - Nope! (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 7, 11:24:51
  - sometimes its best to be quiet (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Apr 7, 10:05:07
- thats what annoyed me yesterday (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Apr 7, 09:39:23
- Ncfc numbers did an interesting stat on fouls (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Apr 7, 09:36:04
- His was by far the worst tackle in the game (NCFC) - earlydoors, Apr 7, 09:32:25
  - I'm not sure about that (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Apr 7, 09:46:30
    - They did three similar tackles. All yellows in my view including Emis (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 7, 10:46:55
- You do the crime you do the time (n/m) (NCFC) - Thegelman, Apr 7, 09:30:29

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.