They don't have any leeway on length of ban
Either they uphold it and it's three games or they rescind it. If they say it wasn't violent conduct then it isn't a red. If it was it's three games.
Posted By: mr carra on April 6th 2019 at 15:17:54
Message Thread
- Farke expecting it to be rescinded? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 6, 15:11:31
- Would be really really surprised (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Apr 6, 15:14:23
- Doesn’t think it will be 3 games anyway (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 6, 15:14:18
- Swot I said. Not violent conduct (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Apr 6, 15:15:12
- They don't have any leeway on length of ban (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 6, 15:17:54
- Indeed. Don’t get why anyone’s talking about a 1 game ban. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Apr 6, 15:31:16
- They don't have any leeway on length of ban (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 6, 15:17:54
- Swot I said. Not violent conduct (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Apr 6, 15:15:12
- I was wondering when I saw the replay if he even touched him. Either way it was (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Apr 6, 15:13:05
- Yeah get done for intent (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 6, 15:14:54
- Can't see it being rescinded myself (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 6, 15:14:08
- Yeah not enough there to rescind it. Doubt we will appeal. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Apr 6, 15:21:23
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.