I don’t understand this.
Imagine player X plays really well, we win game after game. Then he gets injured.
Then player Y comes in, plays really well, we win game after game.
Then player X is fit again.
Both are available. Both have played really well. We’ve won with both in the team.
Why is player Y automatically the right one to pick?
Posted By: Tricky Hawes on March 8th 2019 at 22:16:39
Message Thread
- Next game it’s ok to change it up (NCFC) - Pukki Pies, Mar 8, 22:07:31
- That's the change if you make it but I still wouldn't (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Mar 8, 22:09:31
- I think we will - fresh legs will be important (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 8, 22:23:26
- why not? (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 8, 22:17:52
- Because Farke doesn't want to change it. Good enough (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Mar 8, 22:20:50
- How do you know he won't change it for Hull? (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 8, 22:23:07
- I don't. And I'm fine if Farke wants to change it because (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Mar 8, 22:25:57
- Right, so it's not so much that you firmly believe in never changing a winning team (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 8, 22:28:46
- Im all about team chemistry. Sometimes that means not (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Mar 8, 22:33:32
- Right, so it's not so much that you firmly believe in never changing a winning team (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 8, 22:28:46
- I don't. And I'm fine if Farke wants to change it because (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Mar 8, 22:25:57
- How do you know he won't change it for Hull? (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 8, 22:23:07
- Because Farke doesn't want to change it. Good enough (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Mar 8, 22:20:50
- I don’t understand this. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Mar 8, 22:16:39
- How come then you don't want Klose back in for Godfrey? (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Mar 8, 22:19:33
- Should just be horses for courses (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Mar 8, 22:22:09
- Using your logic then Klose should have replaced (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Mar 8, 22:23:56
- Should just be horses for courses (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Mar 8, 22:22:09
- or alternatively why is player x? (n/m) (NCFC) - Pixelman, Mar 8, 22:18:48
- Indeed. Should just be a choice. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Mar 8, 22:20:18
- He doesn't want to dent anyone's confidence by dropping them (n/m) (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Mar 8, 22:34:50
- I think that is the point (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 8, 22:19:39
- Indeed. Should just be a choice. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Mar 8, 22:20:18
- How come then you don't want Klose back in for Godfrey? (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Mar 8, 22:19:33
- That's the change if you make it but I still wouldn't (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Mar 8, 22:09:31
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.