I clearly meant it's not JUST about results

for the record, I would have sacked Worthginton half way through last season and have always said so because I could see then what he is - a tactically limited manager who got lucky with injuries, had a very solid back four in its prime in the Champ year and had Darren Huckerby in his prime.

In about 70% of our wins that season we scored early then sat back and defended for our lives.

I have never been a fan of NW, his tactics or ability.

Seems most others agree with me now.

And we're not top two so your argument is purely hypothetical and unproveable. No, there wouldn't be protests, but it was never going to happen because we're nowhere near good enough.

Posted By: duke of york on March 4th 2006 at 19:31:13

Message Thread

duke, if not about this season results (NCFC) - sotoncanary, Mar 4, 19:26:12
- The bottom line is is that there is no hope for next season and that is why he has to go. (n/m) (NCFC) - The Duke of Norfolk, Mar 4, 19:43:59
- if we were in the top two and playing like we are (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 4, 19:33:26
  - worzel scrimmage, oh dear (NCFC) - sotoncanary, Mar 4, 19:35:24
    - For fucks sake... (NCFC) - Worf55, Mar 4, 19:43:02
    - Of course I did, but I was still fully aware (and concerned about) his limitations (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 4, 19:38:47
      - no patronising comeback this time sotoncanary? (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 4, 19:56:47
- I clearly meant it's not JUST about results (NCFC) - duke of york, Mar 4, 19:31:13

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.