They are... but less in numbers
Posted By: iwans_ex_dentist on March 4th 2006 at 17:04:40
Message Thread
- Bit sad though (NCFC) - BB_King, Mar 4, 16:50:38
- that's because the performance has been poor by all (NCFC) - notmean_workrate, Mar 4, 16:57:09
- Erm no don't think so ... (NCFC) - meeky, Mar 4, 16:52:48
- What I meant was (NCFC) - BB_King, Mar 4, 16:57:22
- It's not sad as such... (NCFC) - meeky, Mar 4, 17:04:00
- They are... but less in numbers (n/m) (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Mar 4, 17:04:40
- Not really "out in force" then (n/m) (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Mar 4, 17:05:33
- What do you class as force then? (n/m) (NCFC) - meeky, Mar 4, 17:13:34
- Not really "out in force" then (n/m) (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Mar 4, 17:05:33
- They are... but less in numbers (n/m) (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Mar 4, 17:04:40
- It's not sad as such... (NCFC) - meeky, Mar 4, 17:04:00
- What I meant was (NCFC) - BB_King, Mar 4, 16:57:22
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.