I sort of agree on that. They look very solid all over the pitch, but really aren't *that*
great. Leeds look better to me
Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage on January 26th 2019 at 17:09:39
Message Thread
- I know it was a must not lose but I’m a bit disappointed by that performance (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 26, 17:02:39
- Defensively we were a complete mess (NCFC) - Ben, Jan 26, 17:41:24
- yep, poor performance but a good result not to lose (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 26, 17:07:07
- yeah, totally agree on Leitner. We really need him for game management (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 26, 17:05:53
- Sometimes you have to acknowledge the role of the opposition (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 26, 17:05:45
- I think we went a bit more direct and as a result lacked a bit of patience in possession (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 26, 17:08:11
- Possibly, but they press high up the pitch and so there is danger (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 26, 17:09:19
- Don’t disagree - still hope (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 26, 17:11:01
- Mo might make a surprise appearance at Leeds (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 26, 17:11:21
- Yes - he was instrumental in our run pre christmas (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 26, 17:38:34
- Mo might make a surprise appearance at Leeds (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 26, 17:11:21
- Don’t disagree - still hope (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 26, 17:11:01
- Possibly, but they press high up the pitch and so there is danger (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 26, 17:09:19
- I think we went a bit more direct and as a result lacked a bit of patience in possession (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 26, 17:08:11
- A different way to think about it Jim (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Jan 26, 17:05:39
- Course they are. I just feel we had that game in our grasp twice and let it slip (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 26, 17:07:23
- They are an excellent side jim tbf (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jan 26, 17:04:06
- They aren’t. They are a good side but pretty limited. (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 26, 17:05:49
- I sort of agree on that. They look very solid all over the pitch, but really aren't *that* (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 26, 17:09:39
- That’s exactly what they are and why they grind out results and don’t have many slip ups (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 26, 17:12:08
- I sort of agree on that. They look very solid all over the pitch, but really aren't *that* (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 26, 17:09:39
- Created loads more chances than at Swansea (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 26, 17:05:35
- eh? Krul only made one save all game. I wasn't particularly worried about them scoring at (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 26, 17:11:06
- They had loads of great chances (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 26, 17:15:24
- I don't agree, they had very few chances. Yes, some good positions but bugger all real (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 26, 17:46:32
- They had loads of great chances (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 26, 17:15:24
- Look how young our defence is not really a surprise is it? (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jan 26, 17:08:48
- eh? Krul only made one save all game. I wasn't particularly worried about them scoring at (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 26, 17:11:06
- They aren’t. They are a good side but pretty limited. (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 26, 17:05:49
- 2 great goals but not much else (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 26, 17:03:53
- tbf we had a couple of other great chances first half (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 26, 17:06:32
- As we always do, especially without Klose. (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 26, 17:04:57
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.