Passlack looking a bit iffy too. The only one who has been great is - Wrath of the Barclay

Passlack looking a bit iffy too. The only one who has been great is

Hanley who we paid proper money for and is used to this league.

Posted By: Jim on August 20th 2018 at 19:18:14

Message Thread

When Webber first joined I can remember him being (NCFC) - Bonjour, Aug 20, 18:40:26
- Webber's bought 3 defenders at around £3m so far - all not up to it (n/m) (NCFC) - inutero, Aug 20, 19:13:33
  - Franke, Husband and Raggett all clearly not up to it (NCFC) - Chalk Hill Bitter, Aug 20, 20:55:35
  - Passlack looking a bit iffy too. The only one who has been great is (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 20, 19:18:14
    - Passlack who hasn’t played yet? (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Aug 20, 19:40:36
      - Why has he not played? Despite the fact we’ve had no fit full backs? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 20, 19:44:12
        
        That said I can see Passlack could be decent, unlike Husband who’s complete lack of (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 20, 19:45:11
        
        He did ok against Stevenage although Max Aarons looked better (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Aug 20, 20:14:02
        
        I saw both Passlack and Aarons at Luton. The latter looked decent once switched right (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 20, 21:31:54
- Webber is a fraud. (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Aug 20, 19:05:26
- Fair comment. It needs sorting quickly, and loan is the only option (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Aug 20, 18:47:38
  - Lads need a hand! (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, Aug 20, 22:49:22

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.