I believe one of the Kane fouls was reviewed
And there was a foul by stones before it
Not sure about the other one though
Would be nice if there was an NFL style announcement of the decision but loads wouldn’t like it due to more time wasted
Posted By: SCC 28 on June 21st 2018 at 15:39:52
Message Thread
- Would say, the long range shooting in this world cup, thus far has been abysmal. (n/m) (Other Football) - DrDublin, Jun 21, 15:15:31
- Waste of time (Other Football) - mr carra, Jun 21, 15:20:50
- Certainly makes more sense putting it in the box now (Other Football) - SCC 28, Jun 21, 15:28:22
- And eventually fewer fouls will be committed in the box, making it easier to score from (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, Jun 21, 17:31:29
- I refer the gentleman (ahem) to my post at 15:23:57 (n/m) (Other Football) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 21, 15:29:13
- I believe one of the Kane fouls was reviewed (Other Football) - SCC 28, Jun 21, 15:39:52
- I think announcing the reasons would be a great idea. Transparency usually reduces (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, Jun 21, 16:29:32
- The other one he grabbed the defender's arm and held it around him (n/m) (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, Jun 21, 16:27:57
- Could do a data feed to an app (Other Football) - CWC, Jun 21, 15:50:24
- I believe one of the Kane fouls was reviewed (Other Football) - SCC 28, Jun 21, 15:39:52
- Heh heh Mr C, bloody true though. (n/m) (Other Football) - DrDublin, Jun 21, 15:24:03
- Unless you're England, in which case you'd be waiting a long time. (n/m) (Other Football) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 21, 15:23:57
- Certainly makes more sense putting it in the box now (Other Football) - SCC 28, Jun 21, 15:28:22
- Waste of time (Other Football) - mr carra, Jun 21, 15:20:50
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.